Error using `loess.smooth` but not `loess` or `lowess`

Posted by Sandy on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Sandy
Published on 2011-01-10T10:20:02Z Indexed on 2011/01/10 10:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 349

Filed under:
|
|

I need to smooth some simulated data, but occasionally run into problems when the simulated ordinates to be smoothed are mostly the same value. Here is a small reproducible example of the simplest case.

> x <- 0:50
> y <- rep(0,51)
> loess.smooth(x,y)
Error in simpleLoess(y, x, w, span, degree, FALSE, FALSE, normalize = FALSE,  : 
   NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 1)

loess(y~x), lowess(x,y), and their analogue in MATLAB produce the expected results without error on this example. I am using loess.smooth here because I need the estimates evaluated at a set number of points. According to the documentation, I believe loess.smooth and loess are using the same estimation functions, but the former is an "auxiliary function" to handle the evaluation points. The error seems to come from a C function:

> traceback()
3: .C(R_loess_raw, as.double(pseudovalues), as.double(x), as.double(weights), 
   as.double(weights), as.integer(D), as.integer(N), as.double(span), 
   as.integer(degree), as.integer(nonparametric), as.integer(order.drop.sqr), 
   as.integer(sum.drop.sqr), as.double(span * cell), as.character(surf.stat), 
   temp = double(N), parameter = integer(7), a = integer(max.kd), 
   xi = double(max.kd), vert = double(2 * D), vval = double((D + 
       1) * max.kd), diagonal = double(N), trL = double(1), 
   delta1 = double(1), delta2 = double(1), as.integer(0L))
2: simpleLoess(y, x, w, span, degree, FALSE, FALSE, normalize = FALSE, 
   "none", "interpolate", control$cell, iterations, control$trace.hat)
1: loess.smooth(x, y)

loess also calls simpleLoess, but with what appears to be different arguments. Of course, if you vary enough of the y values to be nonzero, loess.smooth runs without error, but I need the program to run in even the most extreme case.

Hopefully, someone can help me with one and/or all of the following:

  1. Understand why only loess.smooth, and not the other functions, produces this error and find a solution for this problem.
  2. Find a work-around using loess but still evaluating the estimate at a specified number of points that can differ from the vector x. For example, I might want to use only x <- seq(0,50,10) in the smoothing, but evaluate the estimate at x <- 0:50. As far as I know, using predict with a new data frame will not properly handle this situation, but please let me know if I am missing something there.
  3. Handle the error in a way that doesn't stop the program from moving onto the next simulated data set.

Thanks in advance for any help on this problem.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about r

    Related posts about smooth